Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 22.06.2025 17:10

Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Single psilocybin trip delivers two years of depression relief for cancer patients - ScienceDaily
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Russia can stop this any time.
Fuga eaque dolorum deserunt omnis velit.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Is visiting holy shrines (dargahs) or graves haraam in Islam?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Senate to Review Trump ‘Revenge’ Tax Worrying Wall Street - Bloomberg
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Thousands of Netflix fans gather for Tudum - TechCrunch
Just in the last 5 years:
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
NASA Switches to Backup Fuel Line After Psyche Thruster Glitch - Gizmodo
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What is the best sunscreen available for summers? My skin is oily.